Al-Aqsa Storm brought the compromise agreement to a halt.
Al-Arabi Al-Jadeed analytical news site in an analysis written by “Amjad Ahmed Jibril”, an expert on Palestinian and regional issues, titled “Where will the regional normalization of relations with the Israeli regime lead after the Al-Aqsa storm operation?” He pointed to the consequences of the Al-Aqsa storm operation and its impact on the policies of the Zionist regime and the United States to normalize relations between Arab countries in the framework of the “Deal of the Century” and wrote: By analyzing the background of this event and its primary consequences, we can identify five factors that It focused on the desire of the process of normalization of regional relations with the Israeli regime. The first one is the change of the influential position of Palestine in the regional equations and the emergence of the inherent will of the Palestinians and the initiative of the resistance groups to attack and their power to surprise the soldiers of the occupying Quds regime and the Zionist settlers near Gaza, which is aimed at eliminating the Palestinian issue and Passing it and ignoring the sustainability of its people were emphasized especially considering the limited success of the “regional solution” approaches and the deal of the century and the Ibrahim agreement.
This analysis adds: Despite the great challenges faced by the Palestinian resistance in trying to revive the national project and restore Palestine’s status at the Arab, regional, and international levels, [the Al-Aqsa operation] increased the brutal spirit of the Israeli regime and the cowardly revenge of the soldiers of the Zionist occupation regime. The Zionist settlers, especially when they committed the massacre at Al-Mohamedani Hospital on 25 Mehr, which led to the cancellation of the meeting between the United States, Jordan, Egypt, and Palestine in Amman, can play an important role in changing Western public opinion, rather than the lies of the propaganda of the Israeli regime and To reveal the double standards of the world powers supporting this regime.
The second factor is related to influencing and increasing the morale of the Arab people exerting street pressure and holding various demonstrations against the normalization of Arab relations with the Israeli regime, as was revealed in Egypt, Jordan, and the Maghreb (Morocco).
Another is the widening of the gap between the positions of the people and the Arab governments regarding Palestine, which opened the door to maximize the role of social and economic crises in the possibility of starting a new wave of movements in the Arab region, despite the continued hostile position of some Arab countries with the movements. Palestinian resistance, especially Hamas and Islamic Jihad, and the refusal of these countries to support them or even establish political relations with them, the Palestinian issue may return to the center of Arab and regional interactions.
In the continuation of this analysis, Al-Arabi Al-Jadeed, the relationship between the marginalization of the Palestinian issue in the Arab world and the increase in the crisis within the regimes that have normalized relations with the Israeli regime, and the possibility of continuing to normalize relations with this regime and the lack of strategic perspective It highlights the Arabs for dangerous normalization of relations with the Israeli regime and the danger of increasing Arab competition to please the Americans.
The third factor affecting the normalization of relations is related to the weakening of “Israel’s image” and the limited options of this regime and the analysis of its power to deter the Palestinian resistance (without mentioning the deterrence of Hezbollah and Iran).
It seems that the movements of Hamas and Islamic Jihad have used the fragility of the internal situation of the Israeli regime and the policies of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet regarding the crisis of “judicial changes” to push Israel into a corner and its inability to expand the war towards “Lebanon Front” despite the policy of “gradual warming” which is Hezbollah’s approach.
It is certain that the “Al-Aqsa Storm” operation has caused great damage to the image of the Israeli regime and its regional position in such a way that the trust of the compromising countries in the effectiveness of the program and the technical and espionage capabilities of the Israeli regime, which is faced with the efficiency of the Palestinian fighters in weakening the reputation The invincible army (referring to the Israeli army)” destroyed the failed mand.
The fourth factor is the positions of Tehran and Ankara regarding the aggression of the Israeli regime and the possibility of their success in influencing the policies of the US-Zionist regime towards the Gaza Strip. The words of Iranian statesmen criticizing the criminal actions of the Americans and the Israeli regime towards the Gaza Strip have increased and the scope of Iran’s diplomacy has expanded by taking advantage of the close relations between this country and Saudi Arabia. Also, Turkey’s position after the request of the president of this country, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, on November 3rd for an immediate ceasefire the opening of a humanitarian crossing to send aid to the Gaza Strip, and the holding of a Palestinian-Israeli regional peace conference under the supervision of the guarantor countries, witnessed a significant change. It has been similar.