PNN – Referring to the dimensions of Larijani’s’s trip to Iraq and Lebanon, the head of the Asia-Egypt Research and Translation Center said: Larijani’s words confirm Iran’s role as a strong barrier against Western hegemony.
According to the report of Pakistan News Network, Ahmed Hassan Mustafa, head of the Asia-Egypt Research and Translation Center, in an article referring to Larijani’s trip to Iraq and Lebanon, stated: Ali Larijani, Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council,’s trip to Iraq and Lebanon is of particular importance from a regional political perspective, especially after Israel’s recent military defeats against Iran. Iran is strengthening its ties with key groups such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and the resistance forces in Iraq, resisting US and Israeli demands to reduce the power of these groups. Iran has used this influence in the past to counter Western dominance, and Hezbollah’s large missile arsenal continues to act as a serious deterrent against Israeli attacks. Larijani’s diplomatic efforts demonstrate Iran’s commitment to creating a united front that leverages Iraq’s political systems and Lebanese resistance groups to resist disarmament pressures.
Furthermore, Larijani’s visits to Baghdad and Beirut reflect Iran’s long-term plan to maintain its resistance network against American and Israeli influence, especially after Tel Aviv’s recent operational failures. Larijani’s trip had a clear message: Attempting to disarm the resistance could jeopardize regional stability and present the United States and Israel with two options: either change their approach or face a fierce enemy.
Read more:
Nabih Berri: Iran is a friendly country to Lebanon/Hezbollah is not going to disappear
A fateful trip to Iraq and Lebanon
Recent visits by Larijani, the secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, to Iraq and Lebanon demonstrate Iran’s strategic solidarity with regional resistance movements. His presence at the Arbaeen ceremony of Sayyid al-Shuhada established a link between the events of Ashura and the current tragedies in Gaza, once again reinforcing Iran’s ideological stance against oppression. His mission in Iraq focused on countering US and Israeli pressure to disarm resistance groups, a move that Iran sees as surrender to Zionist aggression. His visits to Lebanon also emphasized Iran’s opposition to foreign interference, particularly from the US and its allies.
Condemnation of US and Israeli proposals
Larijani firmly rejected US and Israeli demands to disarm resistance groups, calling the proposals a direct attack on national sovereignty. Given Israel’s recent defeat against Iran and Tel Aviv’s call for a ceasefire, Tehran’s position has become even stronger. Statistics and field evidence show that resistance movements have been successful in containing Israeli aggression, and Hezbollah’s victory in the 2006 war is a clear example of this. Larijani’s words are seen by many experts as confirmation of Iran’s role as a strong barrier against Western hegemony in the Middle East.
Lebanese sovereignty and external threats
In a meeting with senior Lebanese officials, including Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, President Joseph Aoun, and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, Larijani emphasized Iran’s policy of non-interference in Lebanon’s internal affairs, while accusing Israel and its Western backers of destabilizing the country. Reports indicate that Israel has violated Lebanese airspace by more than a thousand times since the beginning of 2024, which is a constant threat to the country. By distancing himself from Lebanon’s internal issues, Larijani attempted to shift the focus to foreign aggressors and reinforce Tehran’s narrative of resistance to foreign domination.
Nuclear Diplomacy and Mistrust of America
In an interview with Al-Mayadeen, Larijani rejected any nuclear negotiations without credible US guarantees and pointed to Washington’s bad record of violating agreements. The US’s unilateral withdrawal from the JCPOA in 2018 is a clear example of this behavior, and Iran wants compensation for the damages caused by these breaches. Nuclear diplomacy experts see Tehran’s insistence on binding conditions as a realistic move in the face of unpredictable US policies. Larijani’s stubborn stance reflects Iran’s strategic patience and resistance to coercive pressure.
Iran’s regional superiority
Larijani referred to Iran’s 12-day victory over Israel as a sign of the country’s military might and ideological resilience. Analysts believe that Iran’s network of allies in Iraq, Lebanon, and Yemen has been able to challenge American and Israeli dominance. According to 2025 polls, about 80 percent of Iranians support the government’s resistance policies, something Larijani sees as a direct response to American propaganda campaigns.
Solidarity with Egypt and Arab unity
Praising Iran-Egypt relations, he said that any tension between the two countries was the result of US interference, not inherent differences. Trade statistics show that since 2023, non-sanctioned trade between the two countries has increased by 30%. Larijani called for Arab-Islamic unity against Israel, and considered this approach necessary to resolve the Gaza crisis and confront Western influence.
Confronting the West’s double standards
Larijani accused the US and Europe of hypocrisy for providing arms to Israel while demanding the disarmament of the resistance. UN reports show that the US provides Israel with $3.8 billion in military aid annually. By presenting the resistance as a defensive measure, he presented Iran as a moral authority against new hegemonies.
Strategic alliances with Russia and China
Larijani emphasized Iran’s alignment with Russia and China as a counterweight to American hegemony. Joint military exercises in 2024 and energy contracts worth $400 billion are examples of this trilateral cooperation. Experts see this axis as a symbol of the formation of a multipolar order and a serious challenge to the unipolar dominance of the West, in which Iran plays a key role.
The future path: resistance and unity
Larijani concluded his speech by emphasizing Arab-Islamic unity in confronting Israel and its supporters, and considered the humanitarian catastrophes in Gaza a point for collective mobilization. With more than 60,000 Palestinian martyrs since 2023, he emphasized the need for coordinated action and collective resistance. Experts believe that only collective resistance can break down oppressive structures and establish lasting justice.
The role of the media and interview methods
Despite Larijani’s compelling message, the way Ghassan Benjedo moderated the debate was criticized for its traditional style, reminiscent of his time at Al Jazeera. Some experts believe that the use of neutral moderators such as Mohamed Jaradi could have raised the level of the debate. This reflects broader concerns about the media’s impartiality in shaping geopolitical narratives.