PNN – Experts believe that the Prime Minister of the Zionist regime Benjamin Netanyahu will have no choice but to choose one of two options: Together with the extreme rightists to occupy Gaza” or “Surrender to the international community to end the war.
At present, there are signs of a change in the Western positions towards the Gaza war. The differences between some Western leaders and the heads of the Zionist regime have changed the atmosphere of the dialogue. The reactions of some European countries to the actions of the Zionist regime in Gaza can cast a shadow on the future policies of the West regarding this crisis.
Netanyahu-Trump relations are in conflict
In the past weeks, differences between Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu have been raised in the media. The new positions of the American president regarding the developments in Gaza have become the core of this dispute. He, who always openly comments on global issues, this time openly expressed his displeasure over the continuation of the Gaza war and indirectly invited the Zionist regime to reconsider its military actions. After his visit to several important Arab countries and the signing of military agreements, this message has affected the political atmosphere of the region to some extent.
Read more:
Trump’s recent trip to the Persian Gulf countries was accompanied by messages of cooperation and military alliance; An issue that shows America’s focus on strengthening relations with Arab countries in order to establish relative stability and ensure Washington’s long-term interests in the region. Unlike in the past, this time the Zionist regime has found a lesser role in the negotiations and security arrangements, and the Arab regional actors have received more attention from the American policy makers.
Trump believes that the continuation of erosive conflicts such as the Gaza war can disrupt the vision of the US government to shape a new regional order and divert Washington from its main goals. Probably for this reason, he asked the Zionist regime to change the course of the war. All in all, this transformation in Trump’s political behavior and the differentiation of his attitude towards the Zionist regime can have significant effects on future trends in the Middle East and international interactions with the Zionist regime and Palestine.
An unsuccessful attempt to restore the lost reputation
In recent months, some Western governments have dramatically changed their attitude towards the Gaza crisis. The turning point of this development can be seen in the joint statement of the three countries of England, France and Canada; A statement directly condemning the regime’s military actions in Gaza, and warning against the continuation of killings and the blocking of humanitarian aid. These governments have stated that if the current situation continues, there is a possibility of economic measures and sanctions against Tel Aviv. The change in the official tone of these governments not only indicates the increased sensitivity of Western politicians towards the human consequences of war, but also indicates the widening gap between the Zionist regime and its long-time allies.
The current developments surrounding the Gaza crisis show that the approach of international actors towards the Zionist regime has entered a new and decisive stage. In this regard, this time, the European Union, distancing itself from its previous policies, has raised the issue of a serious review of commercial and economic relations with the Zionist regime; this action is a reaction to the escalation of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the increasing pressure of European public opinion.
Benefit of speech
In the current situation, for the member countries of the “Euro-Atlantic” axis, the most important case is to deal with the “Ukraine crisis” and at the same time to regulate relations with the US-China. The erosion of the Gaza war, while creating a situation of lack of concentration in the Western bloc, has caused very heavy moral and legal costs in front of public opinion and international institutions.
The proof of the Zionist regime’s use of the “weapon of hunger” to intensify the pressure on the residents of Gaza and force them to leave their homeland is not an issue that can only be seen in the media supporting the resistance, because this issue has become a legal document regarding a “war crime” in the 21st century. It is in this context that the letter of 27 world powers and then 80 countries regarding the humanitarian situation in Gaza regarding the need to establish a ceasefire in this area is understood.
Some experts believe that the Prime Minister of the Zionist regime will have no choice but to choose one of the two options, “Together with the extreme rightists to occupy Gaza” or “Surrender to the international community to end the war.” Now we have to wait and see which of these two paths Netanyahu will choose.