PNN – The expert on West Asian developments stated that if the ceasefire in Lebanon is broken and the Zionist regime enters the battle, it will be responsible and the initiator of the war, and emphasized: This issue will put a lot of pressure on the Zionist regime and will not be in the interest of this regime.
The Zionist regime accepted the ceasefire in an emergency situation, that is, this ceasefire was not a choice for the Israeli regime, but due to Hezbollah’s operation (launching 340 missiles and drones into the occupied territories), the Zionists had no choice but to stop the war and accepted the ceasefire with absolute displeasure.
Israel had no other choice than a ceasefire in Lebanon
This expert on developments in West Asia stated that a ceasefire plan was presented to the Zionist regime about a month ago and added that Compared to the current plan, this plan had more benefits for the Israeli regime, but this regime, with the speculation that it can gain concessions in the military field He rejected the previous plan to earn more. It should be said here that the current ceasefire plan was modified to the detriment of the Zionist regime, but Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, accepted it very quickly and without saying a word about any of its clauses, and within a period of 6 hours He ordered the cessation of hostilities.
The Zionists are looking for a more favorable ceasefire
The Israeli regime, thinking to achieve a better position, has repeatedly implemented the behavior based on the violation of fire. Although Lebanon’s Hezbollah gave an important response to the Zionist regime, this response was limited and to the extent of saying that Hezbollah is ready to resume its barrage against the Zionist regime.
This senior West Asia expert said about the continued violation of the Lebanese ceasefire by the Zionist regime: If the Zionists seriously enter the battle again, this time the Israeli regime will be the initiator of the war, while in the previous stage Hezbollah was the initiator and the Zionist regime was in the position of response. If the truce is broken, the positions of these two sides will change. This means that the Israeli regime is in the position of aggression and responsible, and Hezbollah is in the position of defense and not responsible for the war.
Hezbollah’s capabilities are still intact
This issue (violation of the ceasefire agreement) will put a lot of pressure on the Zionist regime, because the transition from the position of defense to the position of attack is costly for the attacking power, so it will not be in the interest of the Israeli regime. And the Zionists probably don’t know this point that Lebanon’s Hezbollah, which stopped the war on Wednesday last week, was ready to fire the same amount of fire on Sunday (launching 340 missiles and attack drones) on the Zionists for consecutive days, and something from that Hezbollah’s abilities and capabilities have not decreased.
There is a possibility of a war in the region
In response to this question, this West Asian development expert said, “Given the current situation in the region, how do you predict the development process, will it lead to a regional war, or will the situation be under control, and for example, this pressure will be removed from the resistance in Syria?” said: The events in Syria showed that there is a possibility of further igniting the war and igniting the region, although all parties express concern about the expansion of the scope of the war, but the nature of the war is something that cannot be controlled very much if a hand is extended towards it.
Future events will not cause fundamental changes in the status of regional powers
In response to another question from Mini, he said, is the region’s outlook uncertain and what the analysis of the coming days is? He stated: The region is not in an atmosphere of ambiguity. Powers are measured in area. Its strength resistance is known. The power of Türkiye, America and Europe is clear. Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the Zionist regime are also known for their power. What we see in the region is the effort of each of these units to improve their position on the threshold of global changes.
This expert on the developments in West Asia, referring to the recent speech of the supreme leader of the revolution that the resistance will spread in the future, said: This expansion may extend to East Asia or Africa. Anyway, these are positions above the resistance and I basically do not see the weakness of the resistance on the horizon of the region.
Türkiye did not adhere to the resolutions of the Astana meeting regarding Syria
Referring to the upcoming meeting of Astana (Türkiye, Iran, Russia and Syria), he said about the impact of this meeting on regional developments: The fact that Turkey requested to hold the Astana meeting shows that it is worried about the process of developments in Syria, because the war is not something that the Turks can throw firewood at and then say that we will control it, so the request to hold the Astana meeting indicates Ankara’s concern.
However, the Astana meeting will be successful if the Turks adhere to its resolutions. Alan, what happened in Syria is caused by Türkiye’s non-compliance with the signed Astana resolutions; Ankara must remain loyal to the resolutions and must show that it is playing its part in the direction of returning the situation to the right situation. Currently, we do not see such a sign from the Turkish side. Ankara should fulfill its responsibilities towards the region and the agreements.