PNN – After about two months since the beginning of the battle, not only none of Israel’s goals have been achieved, but it has been proven that the initiative is in the hands of the resistance in the Gaza Strip, and voices have even been heard in the Zionist media that this Yahya Sinwar is the commander of the resistance operations in Gaza who decides for us, not Netanyahu and his war cabinet!
From the very beginning of the Gaza war and the Al-Aqsa storm operation, the American and Zionist circles discussed the future of Hamas and the Gaza Strip. United States Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, during a trip to the region and met with Zionist, Jordanian and Egyptian officials, discussed the issue of moving Gaza residents to the Sinai desert, which, of course, was opposed by the Egyptian government.
Bringing up this discussion while the war was raging and its future was still unclear, shows that America was sure that the Zionist army would destroy the Islamic resistance in Gaza, and then it would face the question of what to do with the Gaza Strip. And what will its 2 million inhabitants do. They also proposed different scenarios, including the relocation of the population to Egypt, and other scenarios such as Israel taking control of the strip or handing it over to Mahmoud Abbas’ self-governing organization. Discussions were also started in the media about the possibilities and possible obstacles in the way of implementing each of these scenarios. Now, after about two months since the start of the battle, not only none of Israel’s goals have been achieved, but it has been proven that the initiative is in the hands of the resistance in the Gaza Strip, and voices have even been heard in the Zionist media that this Yahya Sanwar, the commander of the resistance operations in Gaza, is the one who decides for us, not Netanyahu and his war cabinet!
Read more:
Foreign Affairs: US military support for Israel and analysis of the upcoming swamp + solution
Therefore, the question is, what was the purpose of Blinken’s trip to the region and the discussion of the future of Hamas and the Gaza Strip, and were they really so sure of Israel’s victory that they thought about the future of Gaza in those circumstances? It is not out of the question: Or all those discussions were a kind of psychological operation to weaken the morale of the Palestinians and the resistance; Or that they had made a mistake in the calculation in reading the path of developments. Of course, the United States and the Zionist regime have a long history of miscalculations, and a look at the past shows that this miscalculation has caused failure and dire results for them in many cases, which, of course, is beyond the scope of this short note. But if we want to mention the causes of these mistakes, we should mention at least two factors: First, the misplaced pride and extreme and false self-confidence, and their inability to include factors in the calculation that are unknown and incomprehensible to them, such as the strength of belief, faith, honor, martyrdom, and readiness to die for a right cause and the resulting results. Now, according to what has happened in the last two months in the Gaza war, it can be said that the question that should be discussed is the future of Israel, not the future of Gaza.
All the signs indicate that this army and especially its ground force is very different from the army of the last half century and lacks morale and motivation and, under the influence of several factors including the phenomenon of globalization and successive failures in the last two decades, has completely lost his belief to fight and die for the cause of Zionism.
In this situation, the speech of Seyed Hassan Nasrallah, Secretary General of Hezbollah in Lebanon, who calls Israel “slower than a spider’s web” and “temporary regime” is very accurate and logical. Now the main question that can be investigated is the future of Israel, not the future of the Gaza Strip!