According to the report of Pakistan News Network, “Mohammed Mohsen Fayzi”, an expert on Palestinian issues, wrote in an article titled “Gaza reconstruction, the most important concern for the future of Gaza” that was published in the Iranian newspaper: The speed, manner and effective actors in the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip will not be more or less important than the ceasefire agreement, of course, with the difference that the Zionist enemy will not face the pressure of time and the resilience of external and internal protests like during the Al-Aqsa storm to implement its plan at this stage.
Netanyahu always talked about the complete destruction of Hamas the day after the war, a plan that even some inside the occupied territories considered it a dream, but with the implementation of the great project of the Netzarim axis, which was known as the death row by the Palestinians. It also kept Israeli pessimistic analysts hopeful that after the ceasefire, at least in the north of Gaza City, the equations will change compared to before the war and a buffer zone will be created in the north, or we can even hope for the depopulation of Jabalia, Beit Lahia and Beit Hanoun. Had
But the first return of refugees in the history of Palestine to their homes after the forced migration and the strong presence of Qassam forces in the north disappointed the hopes of the pessimistic Israeli analysts. With the withdrawal of the Israelis from the Netzarim axis in the first phase of the ceasefire and the return of more than half of the displaced population of the north to their cities in just 2 days, the Zionist dream of handing over the civil and political control of the Gaza Strip or at least a part of it to a party other than Hamas in recent days. The dimming of this issue has caused us to witness many disappointments and criticisms from analysts and military officials of the Israeli army.
Read more:
Hamas: The occupiers are delaying the implementation of aid and reconstruction of Gaza
However, the scenario of displacement of the residents of the Gaza Strip should not be considered as over. Despite this victory for the resistance axis, the issue of reconstruction is still one of the most serious threats facing Hamas and the resistance. From some comments, it seems that the scenario of social collapse in the Gaza Strip is one of the possible plans of the Zionists. Tel Aviv seeks to create conditions where Hamas alone is forced to undertake post-war management and reconstruction.
This scenario will underline the positive role played by regional and global actors in the reconstruction, and the return of normal life to the cities of the Gaza Strip will be seriously delayed. In this puzzle, some believe that the legal and political actions of Netanyahu’s cabinet since last month regarding the expulsion of UNRWA from the entire occupied territories and the Gaza Strip can be defined and analyzed in this scenario.
One of the issues that should be paid special attention to in the future of the Gaza Strip and the conditions of tomorrow after the war, 3 important components that shape and strengthen the society in the Gaza Strip include mosques, schools, universities and houses. One of the serious challenges of Hamas is to provide “satisfaction with life” in Gaza after the war, which is derived from the life and culture of the people in the Gaza Strip.
About 430,000 houses (about 60% of the total) in the Gaza Strip need to be renovated or built; a figure that cannot be compared to the reconstructions of the previous war, so the actor of the reconstruction of the houses can be a part of the invisible power in Gaza.
Hamas seems to be following the idea of ​​handing over the reconstruction to the national unity government. In this scenario, part of the reconstruction and government administration of the Gaza Strip will be handed over to the organization so that financial attraction is also possible. The presence of Hamas and Fatah in the unity meeting of Palestinian groups in China last month and the emphasis on China’s role in the final statement can be considered part of Hamas’s efforts for the future of war.