PNN – The Israeli regime’s efforts to confront the Yemeni threat in three scenarios have reached deadlocks, and Hebrew circles believe that Tel Aviv is unable to achieve what the West and America have been unable to do for ten years.
According to the report of Pakistan News Network, citing the Lebanese newspaper Al-Akhbar, While Yemeni anti-Zionist operations continue at all levels, within the framework of supporting Gaza, the occupying regime seeks to reduce the damage caused by Yemeni missile attacks that continuously target the depths of occupied Palestine and force millions of Zionist settlers to flee to shelters almost daily and at different hours. Yemeni missiles are also causing significant economic damage to the Zionists, especially after most international airlines announced the suspension of flights to Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv.
3 failed paths of the occupiers in confronting Yemen
In this regard, the Zionist regime is working in three directions to counter the Yemeni missile threat: developing defense capabilities, strengthening intelligence capabilities, and trying to force the United States to disrupt the ceasefire agreement with Yemen.
On the front line, Sanaa and Tel Aviv are competing to develop technologies to prevent the other from taking the initiative. The Israeli regime seeks to shoot down Yemeni missiles before they reach their intended targets, while Yemen is working to develop and update its missiles, using field tests to circumvent Israeli and American defense systems.
Read more:
Israel’s copying of the US invasion of Iraq; defending Iran’s legitimate right
Field data proves that Yemeni missiles have successfully evaded US and Israeli systems in many cases. Sanaa emphasizes that the current mission of its military experts and engineers is focused on improving the capabilities of hypersonic missiles.
On the other hand, Zionist commentators and experts believe that there is no perfect or complete defense system, and the success of a few missiles in reaching their targets and bypassing defense systems can cause significant damage.
It is important to note here that the Zionist regime uses a multi-layered defense formation to counter missile and drone attacks. The regime uses, in particular, the Israeli Hitz system and the American THAAD system against Yemeni missiles, both of which operate outside the atmosphere. However, in several missile attacks that Yemen launched on Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv, these systems showed that they were unable to accurately carry out their mission.
But in the second path, namely the effort to increase intelligence capabilities, the Zionist regime is intensifying its efforts to collect information and create a large military target bank in Yemen, and the Hebrew website Vala reported in this regard that Tel Aviv is working around the clock to find such a target bank in Yemen.
However, Zionist experts estimate that what Washington, despite its great intelligence capabilities, could not achieve in Yemen will not be achieved by Tel Aviv either.
The Israeli regime claims that before the Gaza War in October 2023, collecting intelligence from Yemen was not a priority for the regime, and Tel Aviv focused on Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran in gathering intelligence. But Israeli intelligence experts emphasize that the period from October 2023 to today was a sufficient period for the Tel Aviv intelligence service and its partners to obtain information from Yemen, but they did not succeed.
These experts point to the failed experience of the United States and the West in collecting information from Yemen during a war that lasted nearly 10 years and declare that the Yemenis have succeeded in destroying a large number of American and British spy networks.
But in the third line, following the US President Donald Trump’s administration’s forced conclusion of a ceasefire agreement with Yemen, the Zionists are feeling very frustrated and are trying to disrupt this agreement. The American newspaper The Hill reported that the Yemenis resisted the bombing and that we tried all options against Yemen, but the ceasefire agreement that was reached is a great paradox because, first of all, it significantly removes Tel Aviv from the equation and creates a gap in the traditional axis between Washington and Tel Aviv.
The American media emphasized that the soft approach of the United States towards Yemen could be due to current objective considerations, especially given Washington’s focus on the main threats posed by China and the United States’ relations in the region with Arab countries that oppose the region’s entry into the conflict.
Edmund Fitton Brown, former British ambassador to Yemen, stated in an interview with the Anglo-Zionist Center for Communications and Research: The relationship between Tel Aviv and Washington is very close, whether at the diplomatic, lobbying, partisan, military, or intelligence levels, and these relations will continue; but the Zionists should know that the Americans have other interests as well, including in relation to Arab countries such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the Emirates.
The British diplomat stated that Tel Aviv must respect these American rights and that if it wants normalization agreements with Arab countries to succeed and reach Saudi Arabia, it must respect the concerns of Riyadh and other Arab capitals. This means that Tel Aviv will not achieve everything it wants, but as long as the Yemenis attack it, it will consider itself obligated to respond.
Observers believe that all the paths that the Zionist regime has tried so far to confront Yemen and force it to withdraw from supporting Gaza have failed and even had the opposite result; to the extent that we are witnessing the expansion of Yemeni military operations deep into occupied Palestine, as well as the creation of new equations in the naval and air blockade by Sanaa against the Zionist occupiers.