PNN – The Lebanese analyst and retired general analyzed the situation after the “Al-Aqsa storm” in the circumstances that Hezbollah and Ansarullah did not act in support of Gaza and the resistance.
According to the report of Pakistan News Network, “Mohammed Al-Husseini”, a retired Lebanese general, wrote in an article in Rai Al-Youm entitled “If Hezbollah had not intervened in the Gaza war, what would have happened?” Wrote: Since the Battle of Storm Al-Aqsa on October 7, 2023 and the entry of Hezbollah alongside Hamas, many debates and controversies have been raised, some of whom considered Hizbollah’s action to be right and premeditated, while others viewed it critically.
He added: Here we are raising a different issue, which was Hezbollah not entering the war and not supporting Hamas in the war against the invaders. If Lebanon’s Hezbollah and Yemen’s Ansarullah had not intervened in support of Gaza, how would the development process have progressed? Certainly, a different process from what is going on today would have happened, at least the war would not have been prolonged and the international position against Tel Aviv would not have been made. This situation left the hands of the Zionist army open for several reasons;
Read more:
Zionist Minister: We need a broad revision of the political system
First: the calm situation of the northern front did not cause the Zionist soldiers to get involved in this front and they moved with all their strength in the Gaza front.
Second: It increases the maneuvering power of the Zionists, and focusing on one front would accelerate the scope of operations and complete control over Gaza within at least 100 days, and it would be of political benefit to Netanyahu, and he would exploit it internally and externally.
Third: The situation in the Zionist settlements in the north was stable and thousands of people were not displaced to be a burden on the cabinet and the smooth and normal commercial, industrial and agricultural movement had a positive effect on the economy of this regime.
4th: Safe shipping would lead to a normal situation for the Zionist regime and all activities would be normal except around Gaza.
Fifth: The Zionist media focused on the united front and gave a great moral impression to the settlers by praising the Zionist army.
Sixth: There was no extensive domestic pressure on Netanyahu, except for the issue of prisoners in Gaza or his court case, and at the foreign level, the fact that the war was not prolonged would reduce foreign criticism despite the killings of the Zionist regime.
Seventh: It had a negative impact on the morale of the Palestinian resistance groups and they saw themselves alone.
Mohammad Al-Husseini continued: The existence of a war front would not cause concern about the war in Gaza turning into a regional war and would not even put pressure on the Zionist enemy to stop the war or establish a humanitarian ceasefire.
He wrote: In this case, the Zionist enemy, by quickly determining the fate of Gaza, went to the West Bank, which had a negative effect on the fundamental issue of the Islamic Ummah, namely Palestine, and the enemy would try to completely destroy the Palestinian cause and destroy any plan for the Palestinian state.