Will America take military action in the Red Sea?
After launching several missiles and hitting several commercial ships, the US refrained from any military action against the Houthi Ansarullah. Perhaps the most important reason for the lack of reaction from the US is Washington’s different approach to the Houthi Ansarullah. This is while Ansarullah’s extensive attacks against ships connected to the Zionist regime have increased.
In addition, US officials believe that Ansarullah has not directly targeted American ships or forces, which further indicates America’s position, as expressed by Jake Sullivan, the US National Security Advisor. He explicitly stated that Washington does not act alone in its planning, but instead emphasized that America, in consultation with others, meaning its allies and friends, will take appropriate actions at a time and place of its choosing.
The military and security importance of Ansarullah’s movements is evident in the maintenance of security in the Red Sea, given the obvious regional and international developments. Sullivan at the same time held Iran responsible for Ansarullah’s attacks, claiming that Ansarullah may point the finger, but their weapons are provided by Iran. The White House National Security Advisor repeated his claim, saying he believes Iran is ultimately responsible for the attacks.
The US and its allies are currently examining all possible scenarios regarding the nature of the mission of the newly formed naval coalition, whose alleged purpose is to protect commercial ships in the Red Sea and counter Ansarullah. Many experts believe that this coalition may not be sufficient to counter Ansarullah, eliminate their