Foreign Policy: US and its allies’ inability to crush Ansarallah.
In a report, the American publication “Foreign Policy” acknowledged the weakness of the US Navy and its allies in defending the security of ships bound for occupied ports against the military authority of the Yemeni Armed Forces.
Referring to the huge military expenditure of the US-British naval coalition and its European allies on what it called the security of shipping in the Red Sea, this publication explained that “after months of extensive naval operations against Sana’a, the American naval forces and its allies in the Red Sea not only They have become desperate against Sana’a, but these interruptions and the unstable and inflamed situation and the huge war expenses have made the situation even more difficult.
This publication satirized the US Navy as the only pioneer navy in the world, and attacked the failure of the US against the Yemeni forces in the Red Sea.
Criticizing the poor performance of the US Navy against the Sana’a attacks, FP challenged the military leaders of the Pentagon and added: In such a situation, the existence of such a navy that is proud of the naval prowess of the Western camp, how is it possible that in future battles confront its traditional and key rival such as China.
This American publication further cited a military expert in strategic affairs at the Think Tank for Strategic Studies and Maritime Security and added: “The Houthis proved that they have amazing capabilities and they have an active level of activism and at the same time, they have a large arsenal. without exaggeration, it is capable of causing trouble to the Western naval coalition.
This publication called the efforts of the international coalition of the West in what it called the security of navigation in the Red Sea as fruitless, and the 100% increase in the rate of insurance policies by foreign companies to cover the insurance of ships crossing the Red Sea is proof of the continued turmoil in the financial markets following He recalled the failure of the Western military coalition in confronting Sana’a.
Foreign Policy acknowledged that the attacks in Sana’a are only for ships that are connected to “Israel” or the countries that invade Yemen, including the United States, or other countries that, according to the Yemenis, support Tel Aviv.
This publication admitted that although the United States and England have made a lot of efforts to weaken the military power of the “Houthis” by targeting cargo ships bound for occupied ports, this effort has led to a “game” with a huge price and has not had much result for them.
Referring to the surprising power of the Yemeni army in the field of anti-ship missiles, which has led to the erosion of the power of the US naval unit with its continuous attacks, according to one of the congressional assistants, who did not want to be named, it mentioned about the reduction of Washington’s military ammunition and added : “I will say frankly that as long as the columns of flame continue to target ships in the Red Sea, we are in a more difficult situation.”
Foreign Policy magazine revealed that the US Navy and the country’s military industry companies, such as Raytheon, are looking to replace cheaper weapons to counter the Yemeni weapons.
On the other hand, the American internet website “Business Insider” in a report acknowledging the power of Yemen’s Shahpads admitted that Yemen’s unmanned boats (Shahpads), some of which are extraordinary and unique, due to the lack of aircraft carriers of the US Navy in The region is considered a serious threat to the passage of ships towards the occupied ports.