PNN – Referring to the transfer of the integration of fields from the military to the diplomatic arena, a Hebrew media wrote that the equation of mutual deterrence is to continuously determine the boundaries and scope of the conflict between Hezbollah and Israel.
According to Pakistan News Network, “Tesfi Barel”, an analyst of regional issues, wrote in an article referring to this speech of “Seyd Hassan Nasrallah”, the Secretary General of Hezbollah in Lebanon, in a speech in which he said, “The Lebanese front is dependent on Gaza” wrote: The integration of the fields between Gaza and Lebanon in the transition from the military arena at the same time emphasizes that the deterrence equation between it and Israel relies on the ongoing developments in the Gaza Strip.
Based on this, the connection between the developments in Gaza and Lebanon, as emphasized by Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah, transfers the integration of fields, which aims to create a multi-field front in support of the Palestinian resistance, from the military field to the diplomatic field.
In his article, this Haaretz newspaper analyst pointed out Hezbollah’s opposition to the withdrawal of its forces from the borders with occupied Palestine as part of the exchange agreement between the Palestinian resistance and the occupying regime, even if a ceasefire is reached.
Burel continued this report by saying that the fact that Israeli settlements remain outside the range of Hezbollah’s anti-armor missiles will not neutralize the danger of tens of thousands of medium and long-range missiles that the Lebanese Islamic Resistance possesses.
According to this report, less than a week has passed since France presented its proposal for a ceasefire on the southern borders of Lebanon, but neither the Lebanese government nor Israel have given their answer.
Haaretz, citing Reuters, emphasized that Nasrallah gave his answer in his speech yesterday by emphasizing that “the ceasefire on the borders of occupied Palestine is dependent on the ceasefire in Gaza”.
Haaretz wrote in this regard, it is not clear to what extent the French proposal represents the opinions of all the members of the five-member group who have not commented so far.
In the end, this Israeli newspaper also wrote, “On the other hand, these tensions make it difficult to determine an agreed position within the group that includes the United States, France, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt.”