PNN – According to an investigative report by The New York Times, in a top-secret meeting in the White House Situation Room, Mossad Director David Barnia mentioned Reza Pahlavi as one of the options to lead a secular government.
According to the report of Pakistan News Network; According to an investigative report by The New York Times published on April 7, 2026, in a top-secret meeting in the White House Situation Room on February 11, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu personally presented a plan for regime change in Iran to then-US President Donald Trump.
The meeting, which was also attended by Mossad Director David Barnia via videoconference, mentioned Reza Pahlavi as one of the options for leading a secular government.
During the hour-long meeting, the Zionist team outlined a scenario in which military strikes could lead to the overthrow of the Iranian government. At the climax of the presentation, a video was shown that included a montage of faces of potential future Iranian leaders, with Reza Pahlavi being specifically mentioned as one of them.
The response to the plan among American officials was, of course, negative. CIA Director John Ratcliffe called the regime change scenario ridiculous, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio agreed, calling it nonsense.
Despite these outspoken objections and ridicule of the plan by his top security officials, Trump acted on instinct, ignored his team’s assessment, and ultimately agreed to the military part of Netanyahu’s plan.
This report practically demonstrates the organizational connection between the monarchist movement and Israeli intelligence services, and the introduction of Reza Pahlavi as a replacement by Netanyahu and the head of Mossad in an official White House meeting indicates a high level of coordination and joint planning.
The report also notes that the Mossad plan also mentioned the possibility of Kurdish fighters entering from Iraq to open a ground front in western Iran to help accelerate the collapse of the regime, indicating that the Mossad was counting on the capacity of some separatist groups.
This issue reveals the organizational connection between the separatists and the Pahlavi movement, and shows that the anti-Iranian Pahlavi movement, in addition to accepting being an agent of the Zionist regime, had also bargained on territorial integrity in order to achieve government.