PNN – The Zionist regime’s attacks on various fronts in recent years are, in fact, a manifestation of the Zionist “King of the Jungle” plan, which seeks the regime’s Ambition of domination over all countries in the region.
Recent developments in the Middle East—ranging from the war in Gaza to tensions in Lebanon, Syria, and beyond—are not to be analyzed merely as a series of spontaneous reactions; rather, they should be viewed as part of the Zionist regime’s grand, long-term strategy. An examination of field evidence and intellectual output from the regime’s think tanks reveals a plan aimed at transitioning from a “local military power” to a “regional hegemon.”
From the Illusion of Security to the “King of the Jungle” Dream
Documents released by the “Dado” Center for Military Studies—an Israeli military-affiliated institution—offer noteworthy insights into this matter. In an article titled “King of the Jungle: The Role of Israeli Military Power in Establishing a New Regional Order,” authored by two senior Israeli military officers, Dr. Eyal Fekt and Dr. Eyal Jimenez, the center examines the shifts in the Zionist regime’s strategies regarding this issue.
Drawing inspiration from the views of renowned American theorist Henry Kissinger, these researchers argue that the Zionist regime should move away from the “defense in the first circle” doctrine and instead assume the role of a “regional power”—one capable of maintaining an operational presence throughout the Middle East. This implies that Tel Aviv is consciously seeking to project an image of itself as a key decision-maker in shaping the region’s political and security order.
A Long-Standing Project
Contrary to the initial impression that views the Zionist regime’s attacks on Gaza, Lebanon, and other fronts as emergency reactions to specific events, a strategic analysis of Zionist planning reveals that these actions were devised within the framework of schemes dating back many years.
The terrorist act of detonating communication devices (pagers) in Lebanon serves as prime evidence of this claim. Indications suggest that the planning for this operation spanned years. This trajectory reveals that the Zionist regime’s war machine is not merely reacting to events but is executing a phase of a broader plan aimed at compelling regional nations to submit to an “Israeli golden age”—an era in which Tel Aviv’s hegemony, backed by the strategic support of the United States, becomes an established certainty.
Consequently, this strategy makes little distinction regarding the specific nature of individual nations; any country that seeks to challenge this hegemony will face the wrath and aggression of the Zionist regime.
Netanyahu’s Ambitions: From Gaza to Syria
Washington’s unwavering support has emboldened the strategic decision-makers of the Zionist regime. Consequently, these strategists are advocating for a shift in the balance of power vis-à-vis Iran, an attack on Qatar, and a refusal to withdraw from occupied areas in Syria—positions that all form parts of a larger puzzle.
Coupled with the unchecked expansion of settlements in the West Bank and the continued “scorched-earth” strategy in Gaza, these ambitions aim to impose a new reality defined by the Zionist regime’s sovereignty over the entire region. Under this model, opposing nations and movements would be compelled to accept the rules dictated by Tel Aviv for a new economic, political, and security order.
A Deadlock Leading to Collapse or the Birth of a New Order
The concepts of “operational freedom of action” and “multi-front warfare capability”—as articulated in the military discourse of the “Dado” Center—represent, in effect, an attempt to break free from the traditional deadlocks facing the Zionist regime. However, regional analysts believe that this “hegemonic ambition” ignores the realities on the ground.
By shifting its role from a regional actor to a “king of the jungle” seeking to impose its will on others, the Zionist regime has effectively expanded the scope of its conflicts to such an extent that its long-term survival will face existential challenges. This analysis indicates that the current war is not merely about security, but about redefining a “regional order” in which the Zionist regime—relying on unbridled military power—attempts to alter the fate of the region’s states and nations to its own advantage.