PNN – Hebrew media reported: The wall of fear has crumbled, and no one is afraid anymore to oppose Zionist regime in the heart of the United States.
According to the report of Pakistan News Network; this is the headline used by a Zionist professor from Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., to describe the situation facing the Zionist regime—specifically in the U.S. and generally across the globe—in a report published on the website of the regime’s Channel 12 television network.
The article states: From Michigan to New York, control of the Democratic Party has fallen into the hands of Israel’s opponents; it can be said that the United States is no longer the country we once knew.
Yossi Shain, a faculty member at Tel Aviv University, states in this article—from the perspective of a prominent Zionist activist in the United States—that we are currently at a historic turning point, one that is extremely difficult for American Jews who support the Zionist regime. He says: The barrier of fear regarding Jewish (Zionist) power has collapsed. Today, hatred of Jews has become permissible and even politically advantageous. More importantly, animosity—hatred and loathing—towards Israel and “Zionists” is considered not only possible but even praiseworthy; for Zionism is now equated with “racism”—a scourge that must be eradicated.
Today, the term “Zionists” has become akin to a pejorative epithet that has permeated the lexicon—particularly among the youth and within the American political landscape.
Another part of the article emphasizes that when the barriers of fear crumble, everything changes.
The “barrier of fear” is both a material and psychological construct; building and solidifying it takes time. In everyday life, this barrier serves as a crucial tool for ensuring discipline, loyalty, and obedience.
This barrier is constructed from childhood to deter others and enforce submission. In the case of Jews in the United States, hatred toward them was—until quite recently—socially unacceptable, politically dangerous, and even illegal.
The renowned historian Niall Ferguson recently wrote that he was astonished to see how Holocaust deniers have now gained a platform and influence, moving from the fringes to the mainstream.
This animosity has spread to such an extent that the Trump administration’s Department of Justice has stepped in, attempting to shore up and maintain the barrier against it to prevent the anti-Zionist sentiment from spreading further.
Breaking the bonds of obedience and fear usually comes at a high price. This holds true for interpersonal relationships, family dynamics, relations between a country’s citizens, and, of course, relations between nations. In the United States, many elected officials who harbored hostility toward Israel and its standing in the country once feared the influence of Jewish pressure groups on elections; today, however, that fear has vanished.
In the international arena, the barrier of fear between nations emerged as a mechanism linking interests and identity (including “national pride”)—a factor crucial for maintaining deterrence, establishing balance, resolving crises, and reaching agreements.
The author goes on to acknowledge the failure of the bluster, aggressive posturing, and threats emanating from the president of the terrorist US administration: at the outset of Trump’s current term, his threats sparked concern in many nations. Yet today—specifically following the failure regarding Iran—many believe those concerns have subsided and faded, as evidenced by the handling of the Iran dossier and trade issues. The exaggerated, and ultimately hollow, threats that had stoked alarm over the Greenland issue completely collapsed, damaging Trump’s authority and standing in these matters.
In another part of the article, the author addresses the dramatic erosion of the wall of fear regarding Zionist power in the United States, noting:
Today, within the Jewish communities of the Diaspora (outside occupied Palestine), we also observe how the barrier of fear surrounding hatred toward Jews and Israel has crumbled. For years following World War II, antisemitism—a label Zionists use to characterize opposition to Israel in order to cast themselves as victims—was viewed as something vile and shameful, particularly in the West; Holocaust denial was considered a fringe position that carried a heavy price. In the United States, opposing Zionism was not advantageous, and the very definition of antisemitism even encompassed attacks on Zionism. Yet, the situation has now changed.
Today, the barrier of fear regarding Israel’s enemies has crumbled. New York Mayor de Blasio demonstrated that opposing Israel in the largest “Jewish city” yields results and brings rewards. He rescinded the definition of antisemitism that encompassed opposition to Zionism. Indeed, hatred of Israel and Zionism is profitable and reaps rewards.
The collapse of the barrier of fear in the United States stems from multiple factors linked to a “return to traditional antisemitism,” yet this represents only a small fraction of the truth.
Today, the foundation of Zionist activity in the United States is crumbling. While the Zionist lobby has historically faced attacks, it previously managed to prevail; today, however, AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee) has become a toxic label, and the “necessary” opposition and hostility toward this lobby have effectively evolved into a successful campaign.
By this Zionist expert’s own admission, Israel’s (criminal) policies have also played a role in the collapse of the “wall of fear.”
Indeed, anti-Israeli and anti-Zionist sentiments and actions are spreading rapidly today. This trend is not limited to the far-left; it finds significant support among moderates and the radical right, and a broad consensus is evident even among conservatives—who were previously staunch supporters of Israel.
We are witnessing a massive wave of hostility toward Zionism within the Democratic Party in the United States. America will never be the same again. Democrats—and figures like Tucker Carlson—are steadily gaining ground, no longer fearing Jews or pro-Israel pressure groups.
It is widely known that the number of those opposed to or hostile toward Israel among legislative candidates is rising; to the point where “hatred of Israel and Zionism” has effectively become a double-edged sword and an “inevitable trump card.”
In this regard, we must also thank Netanyahu, Smotrich, and Ben-Gvir! Even today, they continue to fuel the situation and shatter the barrier of fear that once restrained those harboring animosity toward Jews and Israel worldwide. As many in the United States acknowledge: They are an asset to Israel’s detractors and the greatest promoters of Holocaust denial.
This phenomenon is not limited to the United States; Yedioth Ahronoth also admitted in its edition this Friday that, according to a poll conducted in the UK, the British public harbors intense hatred toward Zionists and Israelis who have engaged in “reverse migration” from (occupied Palestine).
The report states that the results of an extensive survey on immigration conducted by YouGov indicate that 47 percent of the British public now believe that the arrival of migrants from Israel (occupied Palestine) to the UK should be completely halted or, at the very least, reduced.
In this ranking, only Russia, Pakistan, and Nigeria fare worse than Israel; even migrants from Egypt are received more favorably and face better conditions than those from Israel.
Among the most prominent opponents of admitting Israelis are supporters of the Labour Party, the Green Party, and the far-right party “Reform UK.”
A recent survey conducted in the UK, which examined British attitudes toward accepting immigrants from around the world, reveals an 8% increase in public opposition to the presence of Israelis in the country; a growing number of Britons now insist that the number of Israeli immigrants should be reduced or that their entry should be completely banned—figures that show a marked rise compared to a similar survey conducted a decade ago. Those who conducted the poll attribute this shift to the consequences of the Gaza war and the decline of Israel’s standing in global public opinion.