PNN – A Zionist analyst has revealed that the narrative regarding the “theft” of the election is merely a charade designed to keep Netanyahu in power.
According to the report of Pakistan News Network; Dor Sumer—writing in an article for the research section of the Hebrew-language network Makan—asserts that Israel’s internal security service (Shin Bet/Shabak) is fully aware of the situation. The agency is convinced that the claims about the election results being “stolen” are nothing more than a staged performance orchestrated to ensure Netanyahu remains in power.
A portion of this article states: On the very day the Likud party claimed the election had been “stolen,” the chairman of the Central Elections Committee ordered the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) to investigate evidence regarding election-related bribery funded from abroad.
This directive was issued after Zeini provided him with information concerning the influx of funds from Qatar, intended to encourage voter turnout within the Arab sector.
According to Israel’s Channel 12, Zeini had received this intelligence even before the election but had failed to inform the chairman of the Central Elections Committee about it.
On Election Day, David Zini, the head of the Shin Bet, assured Israelis that the election was “secure.” Following the vote count, Arab parties secured 19 seats—meaning neither of the two blocs reached a majority. Could this entire farce be nothing more than a staged performance, with the success of the Arab parties ultimately benefiting Netanyahu and his right-wing government more than anyone else? Netanyahu does not need to win the election to remain in power; it suffices that no one within the “change bloc” dares to rely on votes that were purchased with money.
Zini met with Prime Minister Netanyahu yesterday and briefed him on the latest developments, describing the matter as a “security case.” Gadi Eizenkot, leader of the “Yashar!” party, however, only learned of the situation late that same day.
Smotrich called for an immediate investigation by the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) into the leaders of the Arab parties, while Itamar Ben-Gvir demanded their arrest.
According to the same media outlet, however, law enforcement officials who reviewed the documents expressed skepticism, stating that the case does not currently constitute a “serious matter.” A source familiar with the investigation told the newspaper Israel Hayom: What has been reported vastly exaggerates the true scope of the case. It is, in no way, a matter of ‘election fraud.’
Meanwhile, the newspaper Maariv, in a critical piece, described Netanyahu as the “chameleon” of the Israeli political scene.
In this regard, Ben Caspit added: The facts are clear: it is Benjamin Netanyahu who has nurtured Qatar throughout all these years. It is Netanyahu who has employed—and continues to employ—Qatari operatives within his own office. And it is Netanyahu who has opposed—and continues to oppose—Naftali Bennett’s call to designate Qatar as a hostile state.
It was Netanyahu himself who, following a failed attack in Doha, offered a sycophantic apology to the Emir of Qatar. It was also Netanyahu who walked side-by-side with a Qatari operative—after the latter was released from detention and had the restrictions against him lifted—even as the man headed straight back to prison.
Yet, like everyone else, Netanyahu goes through different phases; he is, in effect, a human chameleon. You need only perform a quick Google search—or ask an AI—to compile all the instances where the Prime Minister has delivered impassioned, compelling speeches about his desire to integrate Arabs into the government, the ruling coalition, and the administration of state affairs. You would soon find that your phone’s storage capacity wouldn’t be enough to hold them all.
These are not merely speculations; rather, there is an abundance of definitive video evidence to prove it. He even took pride in the fact that people called him “Bibi” (or “Abu Yair”).
This brings to mind an event from the not-too-distant past: on August 23, I revealed that David Zini—the head of the Shin Bet (Shabak)—was the one who blocked the provision of security protection for Gadi Eisenkot prior to the elections. I also criticized this action.
Following the publication of this piece and a re-examination of the matter, I received a phone call. I will not disclose the name of the person on the other end of the line here; I leave it to you to guess. However, the individual—whose identity was unmistakable from the tone of his voice—explained to me that the decision not to provide protection for Eisenkot was not made by Zini; rather, it was made by Noam Sohlberg, the Chairman of the Central Elections Committee. Zini had contacted Sohlberg, and it was Sohlberg who ultimately took the decision.